assignment 1 – approach, editing and presentation

town and country; before, during, but not after, covid

About a year ago, approaching the end of DIaC and looking forward to starting landscape, I assumed I would be able to get to Orkney at some point during 2020. While there, I would put together a long-list of images to use in this assignment. There would be plenty there to play with while examining ideas of ‘beauty’ and the ‘sublime’. However, there was also the danger that I would get caught up in ‘views’ and the ‘picturesque’, that I would just end up taking all the same pictures I always take and that it would all seem a bit stale. So, maybe it was a stroke of luck that Covid put an end to all that…

By November as I began to think seriously about the assignment, it had become apparent that I wouldn’t be travelling north anytime soon, but I didn’t want to jettison the idea of using photographs from Orkney altogether. I had started taking pictures in Walthamstow, as one of the possible candidate sites for part five’s self directed project, and began to realise that some of the pictures were not that different to the sort of pictures I have taken back home on holiday, but a lot more urban. As well as subject matter, there was also formal and compositional continuity in play.

fig.1: an orcadian is a farmer with a boat (but a shetlander is a fisherman with a croft)

I did a search of my Lightroom catalogue using the keyword ‘Orkney’ and got an unsurprisingly large set of results. I narrowed this down to 150 or so, and then did further sifting to arrive at 30-odd images. A final edit left me with eleven pictures which I thought had an equivalent among my London pictures (or, if I didn’t already have one, it would not be too hard to work out where and how to take one).

fig.2: candidate images – contact sheet – (click to open larger)

The contact sheet is made up of the eleven  Orkney pictures (1, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 19, 21, 23 and 25); the pictures in between (up to #26) were taken as I went out for essentials, or for exercise, over the last couple of months in Walthamstow. It didn’t take too long to narrow things down further to nine pictures taken in Orkney and  around fifteen from Walthamstow .

fig.3: sudden flashes of illumination

(The final four ‘fog’ pictures are included here because I am fond of them and the way they work nicely in a neo-Pictorialist sort of way. I particularly like the way #27 makes me think of Steichen’s 1904 Flatiron Building picture – at a stretch it could be used instead of #6 as a sublime, urban cliff-face –  but #6 is better for my purposes and more threatening somehow. Like the two diptyches – fig.1 & fig.3 –  included in this post, they aren’t being considered for the assignment any more but it would be a shame if they didn’t get at least a mention in passing.)

Some pairings are obvious, but others needed more thought. The three alternatives for stone sea stacks all work in different ways. And also, laid out like this in a two by two grid, make me think of a postcard, but that’s the picturesque again.

fig.4: great stone sea-stacks (postcard version)

Then settling on a pair for the photograph taken at the Ring of Brodgar,  the  ‘fog’ picture, taken on the roof of Sainsbury’s carpark is quite beautiful I think, while the shrouded exercise machines in Thomas Gamuel Park have a hint of the sublime around them, or at any rate some form of memento mori. It is a hard choice to make.

Both these pairings will make the final cut , but not all of the others will fit; some pairs will have to go completely.

fig.5- fearsome symmetry

Then I thought about presenting the final images as eight diptychs (which is what I have done with the rejected pairings used in this post) but somehow that seemed to reduce the impact of both pictures, making it more an exercise in contrasts (between city and countryside; between rural and urban) rather than a meditation on beauty and the sublime . Also, there is a danger that this would be interpreted (quite rightly) as sixteen photographs rather than the eight we have been asked for in the brief.

So, I decided to make the Orkney pictures into an animated slideshow  (which would place them fair-and-square in the past, and into ideas of holiday and the picturesque) while the London pictures would be presented as individual images, composed and able to be viewed flat on a gallery wall. Their titles would make the link between each picture and its pair.

I’m not a fan of digital slideshows that mutely dissolve image into image into image, but I was knocked out a couple of years ago by the recreation of Roger Maynes’ installation, made for the 1964 Venice Biennale, at The Photographers’ Gallery in 2017.  The noise of the 320 slides clanking through the gates of five projecters was quite an overwhelming – maybe even sublime – experience; perhaps I could capture some of that, through sound effects (of my father’s Aldis projector and with a simple in/out picture transition, coded in java and then assembled in iMovie). I have added a voice over too, to provide the rhyming titles for the Walthamstow pictures as well as attempting to introduce a bit of Victorian, magic-lantern-show, showmanship.

One pairing still needs to go (eight photographs and the slideshow unfortunately equals nine) and I suspect it will be the last one, if only because the Walthamstow image is the only portrait composition left and it would stick out a bit. A pity though – it’s the most sublime of both sets, confusing in what it shows (a fierce sky reflected in the windows of a locked down pub with a black void in its centre) and  – once you twig what’s going on – redolent of how powerless we can feel in the face of the ongoing pandemic.

fig.6 – annoyingly portrait…

If, by the time I am preparing LPE for assessment, a physical element has become possible again, my submission for this assignment  will consist of seven A3 prints and the video slideshow. While A3 isn’t really big enough for the prints  – in my mind, the Walthamstow pictures are much, much larger while the slideshow clanks away, noisily looping in a windowless room, off to one side of the exhibition space – it does hark back to the days when exhibitions of photographs – for reasons determined by both the technology of making photographic prints, and also the modernist view of what ‘a photograph’ should be –  consisted of modestly-sized  prints, arranged around the walls of a gallery. Also, the role of the OCA as an artistic gatekeeper is acknowledged by my adoption of  the assessment standard of A3 (on matte or semi-gloss paper, with wide borders for handling) for levels two and three of the degree.

My eventual submission for the assignment will consist of seven photographs from Walthamstow, and a slideshow to create the eighth piece of work. I just need now to decide which of the Walthamstow photographs are the final seven and whether the slideshow goes at the front or comes at the end.

I will post this now, and put it up for review on the various online forums available to students at the OCA. While I wait for responses, I’ll try and get the exercises written up, aiming to send the links to my tutor by the end of the month…


Reference:
  • Maynes, R. (2017) The British at Leisure [Installation of five projectors, showing 320 transparencies with jazz accompaniment] London: The Photographers’ Gallery. 03/03/17 – 11/06/16.
  • Steichen, E.J. (1904, printed 1909) The Flatiron. (Gum bichromate over platinum print) Online: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/267803 (accessed: 22/2/21)

4 thoughts on “assignment 1 – approach, editing and presentation”

  1. I take your point about the problem with diptychs I did enjoy viewing them in pairs where the form resonates. I particularly liked the standing stones and car park lampposts – monuments both. Good luck

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I also enjoyed the diptychs, comparing and contrasting the images – could one image of the pair be showing Sublime and the other Beauty? I enjoyed the slideshow a lot especially with the clanking sounds reminding me of old slideshows. I can see how the slideshow running with other images being on the wall might work but my fear would be that it might feel like two separate shows. I was wondering what might bring them closer together, a moving projection where the projected images goes above a corresponding photo on the wall ?? Not convinced myself but maybe something else will spring to mind?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Whilst I do like the diptych presentations I think the slideshow of your Orkney images and a single contrasting view of Walthamstow would work particularly well for the assignment. Fig. 5 is great, pity you can’t find a way to include it despite being in portrait mode, it certainly is sublime connoting perfectly the grimness of 2020 !
    Good luck Simon.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s